Women's health discussion
forums, research news and
women's health issues.
DISCUSSION FORUMS...

Trying To Conceive

Surviving Miscarriage

Overcoming Infertility

Reproductive Health

General Health

Contraception

Pregnancy

Parenting

Babies and Toddlers

Relationships

Mental Health

Diet & Weight


ARTICLES ABOUT...

Relationships

Sexual Dysfunction

Looking Good

STDs

Men

Contraception

Reproductive Health

Conceiving

Pregnancy

Incontinence

Mental Health

Children's Health

Eating Well

Healthy Living

Supplements

Menopause

Weight Issues

Breast Cancer

Custom Search

15 December 2011
Breast screening causing more harm than good?

A new study in the British Medical Journal supports the claim that the introduction of breast cancer screening in the UK may have caused more harm than good.

Researchers say the harms included false positives and overtreatment (treatment of harmless - or slow growing - cancers that would never have caused symptoms or death during the woman's lifetime). The study shows that the harms of screening largely offset the benefits up to 10 years, after which the benefits do begin to accumulate, but by much less than predicted when screening was first started.

Breast cancer screening began in the UK in 1986, with experts predicting it would reduce the death rate from breast cancer by almost one third with few harms and at low cost.

Since then, the harms of breast cancer screening have been acknowledged. So, researchers at the University of Southampton (UK) set out to update the report's survival estimates by combining the benefits and harms of screening in one single measure. The results are based on 100,000 women aged 50 and over surviving by year up to 20 years after entry to the screening programme.

Inclusion of false positives and unnecessary surgery reduced the benefits of screening by about half. The best estimates generated negative net quality-of-life-scores (QALYs) for up to eight years after screening and minimal gains after 10 years. After 20 years, net QALYs accumulate, but by much less than predicted.

The authors say more research is needed on the extent of unnecessary treatment and its impact on quality of life. They also call for improved ways of identifying those most likely to benefit from surgery and for measuring the levels and duration of the harms from surgery.

Related:
Discuss this article in our forum
Early stage breast cancer sufferers choosing double mastectomies
Waiting for biopsy results can make you sick
Question Mark Over Mammogram Interpretations

Source: British Medical Journal


Discussion Forums     About Us     Privacy
Your use of this website indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
2002 - 2013 Aphrodite Women's Health and its licensors. All rights reserved.